Home
 » ISP News » 

UK Gov Softens Stance on Mandatory ISP Filters for Adult Internet Content

Wednesday, October 11th, 2017 (10:44 am) - Score 877
blocked_uk_website_parental_control

The Government has today published their Internet Safety Strategy green paper, which sets out how they intend to tackle online dangers like cyber-bullying, trolling and under-age access to porn. But it also appears to soften earlier plans for a mandatory approach to network-level ISP internet censorship.

Broadly speaking the new paper, which will help to form a foundation for the Government’s forthcoming Digital Charter, doesn’t include much that would concern internet access (broadband) providers. Instead it appears to be predominantly focused upon internet content providers (e.g. social networks like Facebook).

Key Proposals of the Internet Safety Strategy

* A new social media code of practice to see a joined-up approach to remove or address bullying, intimidating or humiliating online content.

* An industry-wide levy so social media companies and communication service providers contribute to raise awareness and counter internet harms.

* An annual internet safety transparency report to show progress on addressing abusive and harmful content and conduct.

* And support for tech and digital startups to think safety first – ensuring that necessary safety features are built into apps and products from the very start.

We should first point out that the proposal for an “industry-wide levy“, which could in the future be underpinned by legislation, isn’t quite the hard-hitting industry tax that it is perhaps made to sound like. Instead the Government explains that they will “look to secure contributions on a voluntary basis through agreements with industry, and we will seek industry involvement in the distribution of the resource.

On top of that we also found it interesting to note that the Government appears to have changed their stance on earlier demands for broadband ISPs to all adopt mandatory network-level internet filtering (parental controls), which would by default have required providers to censor websites that contain adult content (often this extends beyond porn). This was a common debate during 2015 and 2016, albeit one that seemed to conflict with the EU’s Net Neutrality safeguards.

At present all of the largest broadband ISPs (Sky Broadband, BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk etc.) already help to block so-called “adult content” from young eyes via a self-regulatory approach (i.e. new and existing customers are given a choice about whether or not to enable the filtering). Initially the fear was that the Digital Charter might attempt to make this mandatory but the language points to support for self-regulation.

Green Paper’s Position on UK ISP Parental Controls

The current industry-led self-regulatory approach on parental control filters works well, as it encourages parents to think about online safety, but applies filters where they are not engaged. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are best placed to know what their customers want, and to deliver flexible parental control tools that keep up-to-date with rapid changes in technology.

A mandatory approach to filters risks replacing current, user-friendly tools (filtering across a variety of categories of content, but built on a common set of core categories) with a more inflexible ‘top down’ regulatory system.

The control filters offered by the ‘big four’ ISPs (Sky, Virgin Media, TalkTalk and BT), cover the vast majority of UK subscribers. ISPs have transparent mechanisms in place for anonymous reporting of any ‘over-blocking’, and allow customers to ‘white-list’ sites.

On the other hand it’s worth remembering that the new Digital Economy Act 2017 (summary) has already introduced an age-verification system for websites that contain pornographic content, which is due to be enforced in 2018. Under this approach the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) will gain the power to force ISPs into blocking porn websites that fail to put “tough age verification measures” in place.

In that sense the Government’s softer tone towards the existing self-regulation approach by ISPs may be a moot point, although it will be interesting to see whether any blocks enforced via the BBFC also impact broadband subscribers that haven chosen not to enable Parental Controls on their connection.

In fact quite a lot of what has been proposed today is really just a reflection of the measures that were introduced earlier this year through the DEAct.

Karen Bradley, DCMS Secretary of State, said:

“The Internet has been an amazing force for good, but it has caused undeniable suffering and can be an especially harmful place for children and vulnerable people. Behaviour that is unacceptable in real life is unacceptable on a computer screen.

We need an approach to the Internet that protects everyone without restricting growth and innovation in the digital economy. Our ideas are ambitious – and rightly so. Collaboratively, government, industry, parents and communities can keep citizens safe online, but only by working together.”

The desire to make the United Kingdom the “safest place in the world to be online” will also result in the police treating online abuse in the same way as they do offline, which they will partly achieve by establishing a new national police online hate crime hub to “act as a single point through which all reports of online hate crime are channeled.”

We fear that the sheer volume of racist comments, bullying and hate speech that occurs online may quickly overwhelm the new hub, particularly as it is due to begin operating by the end of 2017 and will only be supported by an initial funding level of just £200,000 per year. In no way is that enough to make any serious dent in the problem.

One other big concern is that the drive to rid the internet of bad content could risk running into a conflict with freedom of speech and the perilously tedious issue of context. Lest we forget that there’s the problem of how you define “hatred” and “terrorism” online in the first place and then separate that from related content that may include criticism of the same subject, as well as satire, the right to cause offence, political free speech and so forth.

We can see a future where big commercial websites are all adopting automated filtering systems in order to keep themselves safe from the law, not least because manual validation of every piece of user submitted content would be impossible. But as a consequence those filters might easily end up removing harmless content and impacting free speech. This certainly appears to be the EU’s current direction of travel (here).

UPDATE 2:06pm

The UK Internet Services Providers’ Association (ISPA) has chimed in with a comment.

Andrew Glover, Chair of the ISPA, said:

“ISPA members share the Government’s ambition to make the UK the safest place in the world to be online. The UK already has a head start in achieving this goal, with significant investment from our members into parental control filters, the creation and funding of Internet Matters – the one-stop shop for advice on internet safety – as well as support for the Internet Watch Foundation. As a result, the UK is already a world leader in many respects and this has been achieved without legislation, but more can be done as technology continues to evolve.

The Green Paper correctly takes a comprehensive and collaborative approach, involving industry, the Government, the education sector and third parties, and is importantly seeking the views of parents and carers. Technological solutions are a key part of helping make the UK the safest place to be online but is only one part of the equation, which also requires Government support for digital literacy and skills and education to empower confidence in all those using the Internet and enjoying the benefits and opportunities it brings.

We will now analyse the Green Paper in detail but it has already become apparent that it will be important to target measures outlined in the strategy at the most appropriate parts of the internet value chain. Only a truly collaborative approach involving industry, government, experts, parents, carers, young people and other interested parties will help the UK continue to be at the forefront of online safety”.

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he is also the founder of ISPreview since 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
1 Response
  1. Joe M

    While I am not from the UK. I do believe we need to block porn in the USA. And everywhere in the world. Frankly. I know something that isn’t common knowledge because of my previous profession. You see. I was a prominent hacker throughout the 1990s, and into the new millennium. We worked mostly underground. My job was mostly reverse engineering. But my aspirations revolved around security and development of software. Being in the underground, I was exposed to all kinds of highly questionable activities from all over the world. At the time, the word “piracy” mostly applied to tangible commodities. Not software. Because at the time, most people didn’t even know what the Internet was.

    But in the late 1990s, dial-up Internet was in many households. Therefore, it was becoming far more legitimate. During this time, I began noticing quite a bit of activity originating from Arab countries. Funny thing is. They weren’t involved in IT. Rather, they were posting pirated software, music, movies, books, etc. My first thought about that wasn’t much. Not long afterwards, I began seeing it pop up on various public websites. I thought, “These idiots are going to get caught”.

    Turns out. They didn’t. Because they originated from overseas. People began figuring out they could upload and download digital goods. And it was clear to me that Arabs were buying up this stuff just to post it. Which made not much sense at the time. At some point, I remember hearing President Clinton talking about certain arab countries vowing they would destroy America in ways we couldn’t imagine. And it struck a note with me. Because this coincided with the growing piracy. So I thought, what would happen if this becomes a trend? Clearly, in the long run, more and more people would eventually be online. Finding out they can download anything for free. People would stop buying goods. And this would not only hurt or destroy much of American way of life. But it would also legitimize criminal behavior as a norm. And possibly ruin morals.

    I for one know that people have acquired this idea that “rights” are synonymous with entitlement. Which has bred a foolish generation that cannot stand on its own feet. When the older generation dies off, the present one will fall for anything. So clearly, the whole agenda on destroying America is through “implosion”.

    So I saw this coming before many people did at the time. This problem must be treated like Cancer. Stop it in its tracks. At the source. Since you can’t bust into islamic countries and crack heads. You have to stop them online. By serous regulation. Security. And eliminate anonymity for good. Seriously. Before the Internet, it has ALWAYS been normal for us to have to use our identity for everything. Accountability. Even when I worked underground, I went by my real name. Because I didn’t commit crimes. I studied and created. Anonymity, porn, and piracy are the three main weapons against our culture and that of the world. Solve those three problems and you put our way of life back on track. This applies to all countries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

IMPORTANT: Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically). On mobile devices you may need to load the page in 'Desktop' mode to comment.


Comments RSS Feed

* Your comment might NOT appear immediately (the site cache re-syncs periodically) *
* Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked *
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*33.98)
    Up to 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Origin Broadband £23.61 (*31.58)
    Up to 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £25.00 (*33.50)
    Up to 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £25.00
    Up to 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Pop Telecom £26.99
    Up to 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
Poll
*Javascript must be ON to vote*
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (1986)
  2. Broadband Delivery UK (1352)
  3. FTTP (1310)
  4. FTTC (1265)
  5. Openreach (997)
  6. Politics (991)
  7. Business (890)
  8. Statistics (795)
  9. Fibre Optic (767)
  10. Mobile Broadband (724)
  11. Wireless Internet (660)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (653)
  13. 4G (608)
  14. Virgin Media (605)
  15. FTTH (550)
  16. Sky Broadband (468)
  17. TalkTalk (444)
  18. EE (390)
  19. Security (322)
  20. 3G (282)
New Forum Topics
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Promotion

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules