Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

Ofcom UK Confirm Small Bundles Tweak to Broadband Speed Code

Wednesday, Sep 21st, 2022 (5:31 pm) - Score 2,928
speed broadband meter on grey background uk

Ofcom has confirmed that they will update their 2019 voluntary Code of Practice for Broadband ISP Speeds, which among other things will extend the current “Right to Exit” (i.e. when an ISP fails to correct a speed problem) so that it applies to more aspects of a service bundle. The changes will go live on 21st December 2022.

The existing code is supported by BT, EE, Plusnet, TalkTalk, Utility Warehouse, Virgin Media and Zen Internet (Sky Broadband are due to “re-join … later this year“) and essentially requires those ISPs to provide reliable estimates of connection performance (as measured at peak times) to customers during the order process, and to also help resolve problems when they arise.

NOTE: Sky Broadband, KCOM, EE and Vodafone currently only support an older 2015 version of the code, which isn’t as strict. A separate code exists for business ISPs.

Under the code, consumers gain the right to exit their broadband ISP contract, without penalty, if speeds drop below the minimum guaranteed level (MGAL) for their line and this isn’t fixed by the ISP within 30 days – see Ofcom’s Codes of Practice page for more details.

The existing code defines a residential “bundle” as consisting of “broadband and voice services over the same line (and any other services which rely on the broadband connection in question for their delivery). Pay-TV, purchased or renewed at the same time as the contract for a broadband service.” However, Ofcom will now revise this definition, which could include a wider list of services than is currently captured, such as mobile services and terminal equipment.

The new definition thus defines a bundle as: “Broadband services and any closely related or linked contract(s) for public electronic communications services, information society services, content services and/or terminal equipment. We consider technical, contractual and financial dependencies to be examples of the most common types of links between services and / or terminal equipment.”

What Ofcom has decided

Updating the Residential Code definition of a bundle.
We have decided to amend the definition of a bundle in the Residential Broadband Speeds Code of Practice (the Residential Code), so the customer’s right to exit will apply to their broadband and bundled services in the same way as their right to exit will apply to their contract and bundled services as set out in the revised GCs.

Updating the Business Code definition of a bundle for small businesses.
For small businesses (those with ten or fewer employees), similar to the Residential Code, we have decided to amend the definition of a bundle in the Business Broadband Speeds Code of Practice (the Business Code). This will mean that for small businesses, their right to exit will apply to their broadband and bundled services in the same way as their right to exit will apply to their contract and bundled services as set out in the revised GCs.

Retaining, within the Business Code, the existing definition of a bundle for larger businesses.
For larger businesses, we have decided to retain the existing Business Code’s definition of a bundle to ensure the existing protections continue.

Timescales for implementing these decisions.
We have decided that any necessary changes to comply with the amendments to the Codes should be implemented by existing signatories within three months of the date of this statement i.e. by 21 December 2022.

Ofcom states that services or equipment will not automatically be captured by the definition of a bundle, as it depends on the nature of any links between them. The regulator said they “are of the view that there is unlikely to be a large increase in products captured within the revised” definition.

In short, this is more about making the rules around bundles “easier for customers to follow and more straightforward for broadband providers to implement“, although the revised definition isn’t exactly the easiest piece of text for a regular person to understand (e.g. most people will need to Google in order to figure out what “information society services” actually are). The old definition was at least easier to read and understand at a glance.

The regulator does not expect ISPs to “incur significant implementation costs” from this change. Providers now have 3-months to implement it.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
11 Responses
  1. Avatar photo John says:

    More important than the speed, they should tackle the greedy predatory mid contract increases. If BT is allowed to increase their prices despite the service remaining the same, then I should be allowed to exit the contract

    1. Avatar photo Peter says:

      I agree, if you sign a 24 month contract it shouldn’t change! They should be working costs out for the entire 2 years or they should let customers leave penalty free

    2. Avatar photo CJ says:

      Then don’t just post your thoughts here. Respond to the public consultation that is currently open.

      See the article on 8th October or just go directly to the ASA website.

      https://www.asa.org.uk/news/consulting-on-new-guidance-for-telecoms-ads-and-mid-contract-price-rises.html

      You can be sure the telecoms industry will respond with their views on the subject.

    3. Avatar photo John says:

      @CJ apparently that’s just in relation to the marketing. Though I guess if marketing is mandated to be less scummy then people are even less likely to pick them and support an altnet instead

    4. Avatar photo CJ says:

      Yes the consultation is just about the marketing rules. But you don’t have to ban mid-contract increases to stop companies from using them, you just have to make adverts with mid-contract increases less appealing and less effective than those without. Same result. Currently, those ads work because they are deceptive and hide part of the cost.

      I don’t think the proposals go far enough, so I will be suggesting further change that would make ads with mid-contract increases even less appealing than proposed.

    5. Avatar photo New_Londoner says:

      If you’re told clearly when you take out a contract that it includes in-contract price rises then it is part of the terms of the contract that you are signing. If you don’t like the terms then don’t sign the contract and find a different provider!

      I can’t comment about all ISPs but I’ve recently taken out a broadband contract with BT for my mother over the phone and the in-contract price increases were clearly spelt out, both in terms of timing and amount (the CPI+ element). Providing all ISPs are as transparent then I really don’t see the issue.

    6. Avatar photo John says:

      @CJ Yes I agree, adverts should have the price plus this year’s criminal increase in clear and in bold and not an asterisk with a fine print that no one reads

      @Londoner I would in a heartbeat but only BT in my building so it’s either a scummy 2 year contract or nothing … monopolies suck

    7. Avatar photo New_Londoner says:

      @John
      Not all ISPs that use the Openreach network have the same approach to in-contract price increases. You should have ISP choices other than BT unless there’s something very unusual about your building.

    8. Avatar photo CJ says:

      @New_Londoner
      Right now there are price comparison sites listing £10 phone sims with two guaranteed increases of at least 3.9% ahead of other £10 deals that don’t have such increases. That’s not sufficiently transparent, and I don’t think it should be allowed. I’m sure the same happens with broadband price comparisons.

      It wouldn’t be difficult to require online adverts to calculate the average monthly price over the minimum term including any fixed part of the price increase ie. the 3.9%. That would probably be enough to stop some companies from adding a fixed 3.9% component to their inflation increase, if it meant they ranked lower in price comparison tables.

    9. Avatar photo New_Londoner says:

      @CJ
      To be honest, that sounds like an issue that needs to be addressed with price comparison sites rather than ISPs or, in the case of your example, mobile operators. That said, price comparison sites are an overly simplistic way of evaluating different options, especially given that they may be influenced by a range of factors including commission. You should always treat their recommendations with care and look carefully at the details of each product or service.

  2. Avatar photo CJ says:

    ^8th September, not October!

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5515)
  2. BT (3514)
  3. Politics (2537)
  4. Openreach (2297)
  5. Business (2262)
  6. Building Digital UK (2244)
  7. FTTC (2043)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1973)
  9. Statistics (1788)
  10. 4G (1664)
  11. Virgin Media (1619)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1461)
  13. Fibre Optic (1395)
  14. Wireless Internet (1389)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon