By: MarkJ - 3 April, 2009 (8:48 AM) - Score: 1373 - Piracy
Consumer Focus (CF), a consumer campaign group, has warned that the government is avoiding a full, open consultation on its proposals for a UK Digital Rights Agency (DRA) - instead choosing to limit the debate to a rushed, ad hoc discussion, they say.

The DRA is being designed to enforce copyright law on the Internet and crack down on illegal broadband ISP file sharing (P2P). Consumer Focus welcomes the fact that the Government is developing a strategy to take advantage of the digital market, but has serious concerns about the lack of due process being applied.

Ed Mayo, Chief Executive, Consumer Focus, said: “This must be the shortest ‘non-consultation’ in history. This issue needs debated thoroughly, not decided on the basis of some quick ‘conversation’ held by men in suits.

The Government has gone down the wrong road with this one. The thinking is fundamentally flawed and would result in thousands of consumers being needlessly criminalised.

Several UK ISPs, including TalkTalk , have also highlighted concerns about the incredibly short consultation period (barely 3 weeks). Consumer Focus also believes that the proposals raise worrying concerns about competition law - given that the Agency could also act as a forum for competitors to agree how digital content is sold and provided.

In related news the BBC News Online site has reported that Internet traffic in Sweden fell by 33% as the country's new anti-piracy law came into effect. Sweden, home of The Pirate Bay site, has one of the fastest broadband networks in Europe and an estimated 8% (Statistics Sweden) of the entire population use P2P.

However Christian Engstrom, vice-chairman of the Swedish Pirate Party, highlighted how such a drop would only be temporary and could ultimately make file sharers more difficult to track as they find new ways to avoid detection (i.e. go underground):

"Today, there is a very drastic reduction in Internet traffic. But experience from other countries suggests that while file-sharing drops on the day a law is passed, it starts climbing again. One of the reasons is that it takes people a few weeks to figure out how to change their security settings so that they can share files anonymously," he added.

Meanwhile Andrew Lloyd Webber, the stage show and reality TV producer, gave a speech at the House of Lords yesterday and warned that the music business would be the first to fall if online piracy could not be stopped:

I do have serious concerns as to whether the actions proposed to date will achieve the Government’s aim of reducing unlawful filesharing by 70-80% over two to three years. Government would appear to be willing the ends but not the means,” he said.

To date most of the consumer group and UK ISP responses to proposals for a Digital Rights Agency (DRA) have been largely in opposition. Lord Carter clearly has an uphill struggle, as does the government, with many technical, legal and cost concerns yet to be appeased.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 6

asa logoHistory Repeats Itself
Posted: 3 April, 2009 - 2:25 PM
Link to comment

William Caxton (c. 1415~1422 – c. March 1492)

He was the first English person to work as a printer and the first person to introduce a printing press into England.

Caxton introduced the printing press to England.
Caxton was not without his detractors. There was widespread unease amongst the merchant class of the time, who felt that if the printed page were to become widely available to the population, then it might filter through to the poor.

(From Wikipedia)
asa logoJock the Mock
Posted: 3 April, 2009 - 11:42 PM
Link to comment

The music industry has been ripping comsumers off for years. It probably costs 10-15p to make a C.D yet we are charged the astronomical price of £12-15 for an album. How much of that money goes to the original artists? Now that the fat cats feel the squeeze they cry out about illegal file sharing..........power to the people, viva P2P!!
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 4 April, 2009 - 8:13 AM
Link to comment

On Amazon you can download an Album for about £3 and that applies to a lot of Albums. Individual tracks are also very cheap so I don't think the cost issue is a universal problem anymore, there's a lot of choice.
asa logoRick Dawson
Posted: 4 April, 2009 - 9:56 AM
Link to comment

Amazon is cheap because it is selling lower bit rate files, than other download sites.

The EDM (Electronic Dance Music) scene has plenty of download sites that offer 320k bit rate Mp3 files.
ok the individual price per track is from £1.10 - £1.59
you get what you pay for.
albums are around £10, but what you get is a complete file for each of the CDs if it was bought on CD, and the individual unmixed tracks as well included.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 4 April, 2009 - 10:55 AM
Link to comment

They have a variable bit rate I think, though most of the few I've downloaded are at around 256Kbps. Can't moan about the quality but then it's not like I put them through a massive sound system.
asa logoOli
Posted: 8 April, 2009 - 5:53 PM
Link to comment

For refusing to adapt to the digital age, I can't wait to see these horrible corporations be laid to rest.

Viva la P2P!

Leave a comment


baffled cheese confused cool frown glee laugh mad mixedup noexpression sad sadder shifty shocked smile smirk timid tongue whatever wink 



Characters left (comments containing swear words may not be saved)

Please MAKE A COPY OF YOUR COMMENT so you can re-post if an error occurs.

Enter this code in the field below.
Security Image






Generated in 0.65318 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).