Which do you prefer, a standalone broadband package or bundle?

Standalone (just the internet)
Bundle (net, phone, tv etc.)

Which service do you most desire to be bundled with a fixed line broadband connection?

Line Rental (Calls etc.)
Television
Mobile Phone (Service)
Mobile Broadband

More Polls | Past Polls Archive
By: MarkJ - 1 February, 2010 (2:49 AM) - Score: 1190 - Fixed Line Broadband, Piracy
isp piracyThe Labour governments controversial Business Secretary, Lord Peter Mandelson, has tabled a new UK Digital Economy Bill amendment (200A) that could force those "suspected" of illegal P2P file sharing to pay for their own appeal.

The amendment, as spotted by Friday's Telegraph newspaper, is just one of many changes that make the bill look even worse than when it was originally announced. Interestingly the Telegraph claims that Lord Faulkner was "concerned" by the change, though the nature of his words seem supportive.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester, speaking in the House of Lords on 20th January, said:

"I turn finally to Amendments 200A and 206A, which have been tabled by my noble friend Lord Mandelson. Amendment 200A is intended to clarify the candidates for making contributions towards the costs of the online infringement of copyright provisions. It makes it clear that this applies only to copyright owners and internet service providers, ensuring that the power is no broader than it needs to be. It also allows for the possibility that subscribers may be asked for a contribution towards the costs of the appeals process."

Sadly amendment 200A has already been "agreed" as part of last week’s House of Lords debate (26th January). However it is not known how much "suspects" will be charged to appeal their innocence, which is currently subject to further consultation.

200A: Clause 15, page 16, line 34, at end insert-

"( ) Any provision specified under subsection (1) must relate to payment of contributions by one or more of the following only-

(a) copyright owners;

(b) internet service providers;

(c) in relation to copyright infringement disputes or subscriber appeals within the meaning of section 124E or 124J, subscribers."

Amendment 200A agreed.

Those choosing to view politicians as self-serving bureaucrats, the type who only care about their own wealth and appear to be utterly detached from reality, now have yet another reason to support that perspective. Many of the lords also seem ignorant to both the technical and economic problems inherent within the bill itself.

IP's cannot reliably be used to identify an offending individual and it is surely wrong to charge people for trying to defend their own implied innocence (this assumes that the guilty won't use an appeals process) against unreliable data. Likewise there is a perception that ISPs are cash rich. Here's one case in point example from the same House of Lords session (26th Jan).

Labour Lord Young of Norwood Green:

"We are saying that there should be an incentive on internet service providers to ensure that their part of the bargain should be to have the most efficient and cost-effective process. Which way this will go is an even bet. It is reasonable to say that we do not think that these costs will be passed on, although we do not think that we could find a way of prohibiting that. Our view is that, in a competitive environment, ISPs are capable of absorbing those costs, although I confess that in reality only time will tell."

The structure of an Internet access market is clearly not one that Lord Young and others have bothered to research. A typical broadband ISP has to invest colossal amounts of cash to build its network and, in order to remain competitive, its profit margin per customer will be tiny (just a few pounds or less in the case of some larger players; economics of scale). Hence any rise, even in the order of only a few pence, is damaging and likely to be passed on.

Some of the largest providers have also had to subsidise their service from other profit making (non-ISP) parts of the business purely to stay competitive. This is not a cash rich industry; one quick glance at a few quarterly financial reports will tell you that.
Share: SD, STB, FB, Digg, Blink, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Yahoo, Mixx, Propeller, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 3

asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 1 February, 2010 - 9:33 AM
Link to comment

How very New Labour of them - on the one hand it deters people from even appealing if accused, on the other it raises revenue should they have the temerity to contest the sketchily evidenced accusation. I rather doubt the payment would be refunded should the appeal succeed; the record of some Labours more sinister legislation suggests that the lingering sense of "where there's smoke.." will see to that.

None of this should be done out of court in any case, and they should rather be debating the amount those who are wrongly accused will receive in automatic compensation paid for the inconvenience, distress and stigma arising from the accusation.

Parliament merely adds to the sense it is arrogant, out of touch and has no sense of proportion.
asa logotimeless
Posted: 1 February, 2010 - 10:02 AM
Link to comment

heh, regardless of innocence they are pretty much trying to imply guilt onto everyone.. either way they get money to fill the pockets of the companies that already have enough already.

as for the government, l dont fancy giving yet more money to the government that they can just flutter away on laws that make no sense because they havent bothered investigating correct information, all it boils down to is places like the BPI have told them what they believe and the government has inserted wool into its ears unwilling to listen to the truth from ISPs who actually know the technology!!
asa logoCC
Posted: 1 February, 2010 - 12:36 PM
Link to comment

Sign the petition

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/dontdisconnectus/

Leave a comment


baffled cheese confused cool frown glee laugh mad mixedup noexpression sad sadder shifty shocked smile smirk timid tongue whatever wink 



Characters left (comments containing swear words may not be saved)

Please MAKE A COPY OF YOUR COMMENT so you can re-post if an error occurs.

Enter this code in the field below.
Security Image





Previous News Stories
2 September, 2010
2:58 PM - UK Business ISP Easynet Global and BSkyB Complete Sale to Private Equity LDC - (0)
2:40 PM - Orange UK Joins 3 and T-Mobile in 3G Mobile Broadband Network Share - (0)
1:02 PM - Virgin Media UK Provides Broadband ISP Speed Clarity to Customers - (3)
7:16 AM - UK Consumer Panel Urges Gov to Get Tough on Misleading Broadband ISP Speeds - (0)
2:00 AM - Virgin Media UK Raises Cable Broadband ISP Install Charge to 40 Pounds - (0)
1:16 AM - UK FTTH Fibre Optic Broadband ISP Fibreband Offers Standalone Services - (3)
1 September, 2010
12:56 PM - UK Advertising Watchdog Given Powers to Tackle Broadband ISP Website Ads - (0)
12:10 PM - Top 9 Fastest UK Broadband ISPs Ranked by Speed for August 2010 - (0)
9:01 AM - UK ISP Aquiss Offers FREE Business 40Mb Fibre Optic FTTC Broadband Installs - (0)
7:28 AM - Rural Norfolk UK Campaigners Criticise BT Claims of National Broadband Success - (3)
31 August, 2010
2:17 PM - Fibrecity Offer FREE 100Mb Fibre Optic Broadband Connections to Dundee UK - (2)
1:55 PM - Huawei Helps BT Deploy its Superfast UK Fibre Optic Broadband Service - (0)
1:16 PM - Broadband ISP Migration Problems Still Impact Half of UK Switchers - (0)
8:26 AM - Gadgetshow UK Launch TV Campaign to Stop Bad Broadband Speed Advertising - (2)
7:08 AM - UPDATE BT Group Celebrates 15 Millionth Broadband ISP Connection in the UK - (0)
28 August, 2010
1:00 AM - YouTube UK Launch FREE Broadband Movie Streaming Service - (0)
27 August, 2010
1:35 PM - More than 19 Million UK Households Now Have Internet Access in 2010 - (2)
8:19 AM - UK Law Firm Ralli Seeks Group Action for Harassment Against ACS Law - (2)
7:23 AM - UK ISP XILO Reveals Preliminary 40Mbps Fibre Optic FTTC Broadband Prices - (3)
1:20 AM - Fibrecity Appoints Former BT CEO to Manage Open UK Broadband Platform - (0)
26 August, 2010
2:12 PM - Ofcom UK Illegal Broadband ISP Copyright File Sharing Code Facing Delays - (4)
8:33 AM - UK ISP Entanet Slams USA Google and Verizon Net Neutrality Partnership - (0)
8:06 AM - ZyXEL and Carrier Wales Deliver Uncontended Broadband to Welsh Businesses - (1)
7:19 AM - T-Mobile UK Slashes Pay Per Day Mobile Broadband Price - (0)
1:44 AM - UK ISP TalkTalk Launches 2010 Digital Heroes Awards - (0)
25 August, 2010
12:35 PM - UK ISP PlusNet CEO Departs and is Replaced by Jamie Ford - (2)
9:38 AM - Virgin Media UK Extends 2 MONTHS FREE Broadband Service Bundles - (0)
9:12 AM - WARNING New Phone SCAM Targeting UK Broadband ISP Customers - (1)
8:34 AM - Europe and USA Broadband ISP Prices Continue to Fall as Speeds Increase - (0)
7:31 AM - BT Consistently Fast Broadband Adverts Banned by UK Advertising Authority - (2)
24 August, 2010
12:41 PM - Channel Five Rejoins UK Open Broadband TV Standard Project Canvas - (0)
9:01 AM - PCCW Backed UK Broadband Group Gives Hope to WiMAX Wireless - (7)
8:48 AM - BSkyB Mulling the Closure of Broadband ISP Sibling UK Online - (0)
7:55 AM - Local South West England Council Defines NGA UK Broadband as 5Mbps - (1)
7:05 AM - ACS Law Referred to Disciplinary Tribunal Over UK ISP File Sharing Threat Letters - (1)

Generated in 0.5247 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).