By: MarkJ - 23 March, 2011 (7:48 AM)
UK DCMS internet copyrightpirate flagIt's been revealed that UK ISPs and Rights Holders are debating a controversial ("Plan B") alternative to the Digital Economy Act's (DEA) original website blocking clause. The move would see broadband providers adopt a new Voluntary Code of Practice to block any website that is deemed to "facilitate" internet copyright infringement.

A list of the 100 worst offenders, including The Pirate Bay, NewzBin2 and several cyberlocker file storage sites (e.g. Rapidshare?), has reportedly already been drawn up. The confirmation comes shortly after Ofcom was asked to review the DEA's original web blocking measures (here) and some anticipate that the review will ultimately deem those unfeasible.

Since then the UK government has been working hard to bring both ISPs and Rights Holders together, largely in the hope that they would draw up a more workable alternative to the original measures (here).

A Rights Holder source said:

"Cheaper than notice sending would be site blocking. We're more interested in site blocking [than mass notification letters]. We don't want to target end users, [the mass notification system] is long winded – we want something now."

However, as The Guardian newspaper hints, the new voluntary code has a number of significant stumbling blocks. Firstly, ISPs don't want to cut-off websites without an impartial judge being brought in to asses each case. We agree with this as some cyberlockers', such as Rapidshare which has repeatedly been cleared by the courts, could otherwise risk unfair discrimination (i.e. MarkMonitor Labels Legitimate Websites as Illegal Internet Piracy Heavens).

Secondly, it's unclear who would foot the bill for compensation if a website were to successfully sue an ISP over unfair censorship. The issue of cost is also a contentious one as such systems are not free, although in theory providers could adapt the existing Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) filter for child sexual abuse content.

Sadly the new proposal, which is apparently favoured by copyright holders, still suffers from the same fundamental problem as the old one. It fails to recognise that ISP's have no control to physically remove or block content that does not exist within their own network.

As a result of the above, any form of website blocking imposed by an ISP is merely an illusion (mask) and easily circumvented through a number of simple end-user solutions (e.g. VPN, Proxy Servers, DNS re-routing etc.). It would also have no direct effect upon P2P (file sharing) traffic; although it could block mask some of the popular BitTorrent indexing sites.

Meanwhile TalkTalk and BT will go to court today as part of their Digital Economy Act Judicial Review. Three days of hearings will be heard and then the judge will go away to consider. Given the gravity of this case it's expected that the judge could take awhile to reach a decision. Meanwhile the act itself has now been delayed until Spring 2012 at the earliest (here).
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 2

asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 23 March, 2011 - 9:41 AM
Link to comment

It beggars belief that so much apparent effort and time has been expended by ISPs, parliament and of course the munters in the so-called "creative industries", given how utterly trivial all of the proposed methods are to bypass. The inability of most MPs to grasp even the absolute basics should be a cause of real shame, while the 'geniuses' in the music business might do better to fix their industry rather than creating a Fort Knox quality front door while leaving the back door wide open.

Alternative DNS costs nothing and very workable personal VPN costs about 20 quid a year, which makes the "rights holders" Stalinist censorship regime look about as useful as the Maginot Line was for the French in 1940.

If disproporionate stupidity and slavering greed were Olympic sports, the backers of this would guarantee a good haul of Golds for Britain in every event.
asa logolame
Posted: 23 March, 2011 - 5:35 PM
Link to comment

Hey UK people, just use TOR to access the sites. <yawn>



Generated in 0.19966 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).