» ISP News » 

UPD2 EU Sets Out Rules to Boost Fibre Broadband Competition Until 2020

Thursday, July 12th, 2012 (1:41 pm) - Score 696

The European Commission (EC) has today set out new rules to help boost investment, development and competition in the rollout of superfast broadband technologies and services right across Europe, which will “apply at least until 2020” and support its wider Digital Agenda targets.

Europe’s current Digital Agenda strategy seeks to make superfast broadband speeds of 30Mbps+ available to 100% by 2020, with 50% or more being within reach of an ultra-fast 100Mbps+ service.

Today’s changes are thus targeted towards fostering the development of faster, predominantly fibre optic (FTTx) based, internet services and preventing incumbents, such as BT in the UK, from getting “an unfair advantage” as many rival ISPs often complain. But the EC warns that “too much intervention constrains flexibility” and has decided to leave most control over next gen networks (NGA) with incumbents and national regulators.

Elsewhere one of the most controversial ideas for boosting investment, which proposed to raise or lower the cost of existing copper broadband (e.g. ADSL2+) services in a way that would make fibre solutions more attractive for consumers (original news), appears to have been left up to local regulators (i.e. it will remain a “single market issue“).

Neelie Kroes, VP of the EU’s Digital Agenda policy, said, “The evidence shows that lowering those prices will not induce greater investment in very fast broadband.” Kroes also noted that investment in fibre services was “progressing relatively well in some Member States where copper prices are around or above the EU average“.

Next the EC has proposed greater flexibility in how “next generationwholesale products can be priced, which will be subject to “meeting strict conditions to ensure fair competition“. But this will not involved the “last-resort remedy” of “functional separation” (e.g. splitting BTOpenreach up in to an entirely separate business). Instead the EC wants Ofcom to check that an “efficient operator would be able to compete with the incumbent’s retail product on the basis of the same wholesale access products provided“.

Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the EC, said:

Today in Europe we stand on the brink of a new digital transition. New applications and services, from e-Health to the cloud to Connected TV, stand to offer huge benefits for citizens and businesses, and an overall boost to our economy. But many of these new ideas cannot run on copper-based ADSL broadband networks. We cannot let our networks be the bottleneck for this amazing opportunity: we need investment in new high-speed infrastructure. And for that, we need the sector that provides that vital infrastructure – telecoms companies and others – to be strong.

Over a decade ago, we successfully introduced competition to European telecom networks. The results to date have been positive for consumers and businesses. But the transition to an expensive new generation of high-speed networks, co-existing with the old, poses special challenges. Though the public sector can help, the real heavy lifting must be done by private investment. Clearly, whatever the network and whatever the operator, people need to see an adequate return before they will invest: taking into account the risks.”

On top of all that the EC will, later this year, propose new measures to cut the cost of superfast broadband roll-out’s, such as through “better re-use and sharing of [cable] duct infrastructure across sectors, and smoother permitting.” Kroes added that, “no operator would today build a copper network,” and said she wanted all industry players to, “receive the signal loud and clear – that they can invest profitably in the future connectivity of Europe, and compete on the basis of their investment“.

The new rules could have an impact upon the UK government’s strategy, which aims to make superfast broadband speeds of 24Mbps+ available to 90% of the country by 2015. Europe is understood to have expressed concern over the country’s allocation of state aid (here), which appears to favour BT, doesn’t open access to Dark Fibre and effectively excludes smaller providers. The UK’s target of 24Mbps+ is also somewhat below Europe’s.

A BTOpenreach Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:

BT has long been in favour of regulatory clarity and certainty and so these are very welcome proposals from Commissioner Kroes. BT already provides other companies with fair and equal access to its network but this is unusual in Europe. The business case for fibre is tough and most companies are unwilling to make this long term investment so the regulatory certainty being proposed is encouraging. We hope that other parts of the Commission follow the Commissioner’s lead in developing guidelines that promote investment and competition.”

As usual the devil could be in the detail. The EC expects to put its full body of formal recommendations into legal form and release it before the end of this year. Related regulatory plans are also expected to show up for validation in the autumn. But it should be said that most of the changes are aimed at countries that have less competitive markets than the UK.

EC Policy statement by Vice President Kroes

UPDATE 2:51pm

Added a comment from BTOpenreach above.

UPDATE 13th July 2012

The European Competitive Telecommunications Association (ECTA), which represents alternative / smaller ISPs, has accused the EC of not being strict enough and allowing incumbent operators to retain too much freedom and control over the Next Generation Access (NGA) market (i.e. maintaining the status quo). But it has also welcomed the move to implement greater non-discrimination obligations.

Tom Ruhan, ECTA’s Chairman, said:

We welcome and strongly support the approach to non-discrimination taken by Neelie Kroes. Abusive and discriminatory conducts of incumbent operators have a direct impact on consumers’ services and wallets. But we deeply regret the approach that Mrs Kroes is suggesting on price methodologies. As a result of this approach incumbents will not only be allowed to regain full monopolies on future networks, they will also be allowed to continue overcharging consumers and starving competitors on existing networks.

This is a departure from the approach taken with the NGA Recommendation in 2010 and might take Europe back to the pre-liberalization era. The EU already lags behind other regions of the world when it comes to super fast broadband – an important enabler of economic growth – and these measures will set us further back.”

ECTA fears that alternative operators, many of which “will be forced to keep transferring the near-totality of their cashflows to incumbents“, could now end up being forced out of the market.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
9 Responses
  1. What? says:

    I think this is more aimed at countries like France, where everyone has to use France Telecom, and they are the only company that are allowed to lay cable.

    1. Mark Jackson says:

      Yes and No. Some of the aspects will affect the UK, such as the EC’s view that incumbent operators should make Dark Fibre available to rivals. That contradicts Ofcom’s very recently updated and continued stance of opposing such a move.

      But certainly it’s fair to say that the UK market is already quite competitive compared to some, though there is room for improvement.

  2. zemadeiran says:


    ISP’s should only be able to charge for achieved bandwidth, i.e 1mbps.

    All this up to bollocks has to go!

    £15 for up to 24mbps? I can only get 3mbps so will pay £1.87p per month.

    Watch all the providers up their game including BT.

    1. cyclope says:

      Well it would certainly put an end to the use of DLM and profiles,It may even get lines that offer low performance looked at by openreach, after all FTTC will not improve speeds for some who are unfortunate enough to have a poor line,They should be required to sort things like this out, not hide behind the outdated SIN whatever number it is, specification,

    2. FibreFred says:

      “Watch all the providers up their game including BT”

      or in reality….

      “Watch all the providers deny you a service including BT”

      In terms of set-up/running costs it costs the same (minus bandwidth) to setup someone on 1Mnps connection as it does 20Mbps+

      So if that new way of working came in bearing in mind broadband is too cheap anyway then people with projected low speeds wouldn’t be offered a service in the first place as they’d generate no money

  3. Deduction says:

    The other problem with charging based on speed is the opposite problem to those that suffer poor speed.

    That being someone that lives in an area where they can MAX or as near as MAX out ADSL/2/2+ and/or Fibre based services may not want or need all that speed. They may also only use the internet a couple of times a month to say send an email to uncle fred. Why should those people pay more for benefits they dont need or want?

    Personally i think the solution would be to make speeds consistent across the country but with a naff make do FTTC solution and BT still the monopoly thats never gonna happen.

    1. Somerset says:

      How would your solution for consistent speeds work and be funded?

    2. Deduction says:

      Shouldnt need any extra funding if all the claims you and others have made about FTTC speeds to everyone were true.

  4. zemadeiran says:

    This is why we should think about giving broadband the same status as other utilities. With so many government services on line, it is essential that we do so.

    So someone living next door to the exchange gets 24mbps and what?

    If they just need 1mbps give them the choice. I fully understand that provision on the hardware level is identical, the service provision is the sore point for many people paying for something not achieved. It is ludicrous that the customer should be forced to pay for up to whatever, so in the same vein EDF et all would charge you every month for 10000 KWH of power whether you achieve that use or not.

    The AC cabling costs the same whatever your consumption.

    THEY, want to provide universal access to all walks of life for the whole of the UK so ALSO make it a universal RIGHT across the board and set it in law!

    You want to be an isp? if a customer wants your service you are obliged to provide one. BT would be happy about the situation as they still get their copper monopoly money…

    Broadband in this country is not already too cheap, bandwidth around the island is unlimited and many online services have servers in data centres across the UK.

    Most if not all isp’s do not give a shit full stop, they want your money end of.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £20.00 (*25.00)
    Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £21.95 (*38.20)
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • Vodafone £22.00 (*25.00)
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW £23.00 (*32.00)
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £23.00 (*29.95)
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
New Forum Topics
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Community Fibre £25.00 (*29.50)
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: First Month Free
  • Hyperoptic £25.00 (*35.00)
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Gigaclear £26.00 (*54.00)
    Speed: 400Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £26.00 (*52.00)
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £26.00 (*29.00)
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (3398)
  2. BT (2984)
  3. Politics (1891)
  4. Building Digital UK (1889)
  5. FTTC (1872)
  6. Openreach (1796)
  7. Business (1641)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1443)
  9. Statistics (1388)
  10. FTTH (1363)
  11. 4G (1249)
  12. Fibre Optic (1150)
  13. Virgin Media (1139)
  14. Wireless Internet (1135)
  15. Ofcom Regulation (1126)
  16. Vodafone (822)
  17. EE (816)
  18. TalkTalk (750)
  19. 5G (735)
  20. Sky Broadband (731)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact