Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Ofcom Looks to Defragment 3.4-3.8GHz Bands to Boost 5G Mobile

Tuesday, June 11th, 2019 (4:06 pm) - Score 2,139
5g uk mobile broadband

The UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has proposed to defragment (no.. not their computer hard disks) the 3.4-3.8GHz radio spectrum bands after next year’s auction, which could enable mobile network operators to get the best performance and save money on their new 5G ultrafast mobile broadband networks.

As a general assumption 5G networks, which are only just starting to rollout across the United Kingdom, tend to work at their best when they have access to large contiguous blocks of radio spectrum. At present the only operator to hold such a thing is Three UK (H3G / UKB), which harbours 140MHz of 5G friendly spectrum and that includes a single 100MHz block in the aforementioned bands (rivals tend to have 50MHz or 40MHz blocks).

ofcom_5g_uk_spectrum_fragmentation_june_2019

The above situation is all thanks to one of Ofcom’s recent decisions (here). At the time the regulator said, “We do not consider it likely that any benefit to [Three UK] of gaining access to 100 MHz of contiguous spectrum, as opposed to separate 84 MHz and 20 MHz blocks, would be so significant as to provide H3G with an unmatchable competitive advantage over its competitors.”

Nevertheless today’s new consultation agrees that 5G is still “likely to perform best using large, contiguous blocks of spectrum,” although at present this would not be possible without operators agreeing to trade spectrum (easier said than done). On top of that the next auction in the 3.6GHz3.8GHz bands will only free up 120MHz of spectrum (i.e. not enough to give more than a single operator access to a contiguous holding of 80MHz).

NOTE: The main advantage of a large contiguous block is that it avoids higher equipment costs (i.e. operators can use a single antennae, rather than several for bands that are wide apart).

Ofcom proposes to solve this problem by including new measures in the upcoming auction which could facilitate defragmentation of the band.

Ofcom Statement

In order to facilitate defragmentation of the 3.4-3.8 GHz band, we are minded to impose a restriction on winners of less than 20MHz of 3.6-3.8 GHz spectrum to bidding only for the top or bottom of the 3.6-3.8 GHz band in the assignment stage of the auction.

In addition, we are also minded to include a negotiation phase, within the assignment stage of the auction, during which winners of 3.6-3.8 GHz spectrum would have the opportunity to agree the assignment of frequencies in the 3.6-3.8 GHz band between themselves.

This document sets out our revised proposals and two possible sub-options of the negotiation phase. One sub-option, which we considered in the December 2018 consultation, would require unanimous agreement among the winning bidders of 3.6-3.8 GHz spectrum. The other sub-option, which have set out in this document in light of stakeholders’ comments, would allow for partial agreement in the absence of unanimous agreement.

Ofcom intends to consult on this proposal until 10th July 2019 and they will then publish their final decision on the upcoming award of spectrum in the 700MHz and 3.6-3.8GHz bands later this year. At present the goal is still to conduct the related auction next Spring 2020, at least the regulator hasn’t yet said anything different but delays seem to be par for the course in mobile land.

Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
1 Response
  1. Avatar Joe

    “The above situation is all thanks to one of Ofcom’s recent decisions ”

    We could say that about a lot of ‘net problems 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £20.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.45 (*36.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Post Office £22.90 (*37.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2512)
  2. FTTP (2207)
  3. FTTC (1660)
  4. Building Digital UK (1607)
  5. Politics (1429)
  6. Openreach (1419)
  7. Business (1240)
  8. Statistics (1100)
  9. FTTH (1077)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1040)
  11. Fibre Optic (970)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (916)
  13. Wireless Internet (910)
  14. 4G (901)
  15. Virgin Media (858)
  16. Sky Broadband (596)
  17. EE (592)
  18. TalkTalk (580)
  19. Vodafone (519)
  20. Security (413)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact