EU Propose Legally Binding Broadband Universal Service Obligation
The United Kingdom is already building a legally binding Universal Service Obligation (USO) for 10Mbps broadband speeds and a new leak of future EU telecoms proposals appears to confirm that the European Commission are planning to do something similar.
A couple of weeks ago we reported on another leak of future EU telecoms policy, which appeared to all but confirm that a new target would be set to ensure that “all European households” can get a minimum Internet download speed of 100Mbps (Megabits per second) by 2025, with businesses and the public sector also being told to expect 1Gbps speeds (here).
The above is a commitment rather than a legally-binding USO and now EurActiv has leaked yet more documents, which reveal that the EU also intend to make “basic broadband” (the previous EU Digital Agenda defined this as anything from 0.5Mbps to 4Mbps) a legally guaranteed service for all.
However the proposals, which have yet to be fleshed out, do not currently dictate a minimum speed and would allow wireless and Satellite technologies as part of the USO fix.
At this point the UK is still part of the EU and will remain so until around 2019/20, which means that the UK Government must continue to take any proposals by the EU seriously. Similarly it’s important to keep an eye on the EU in case domestic UK policy falls behind. Currently it’s still too early to tell if the EU will end up doing something that goes beyond what the UK has already proposed, although early signs suggest that they may take a softer approach.
The new proposals should be tabled by the executive in September 2016 and will form part of the previously reported 100Mbps pledge, which could all be agreed by the end of 2017 and then implemented from 2019.
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, Google+, Facebook and Linkedin.
« Farewell to BT’s Unloved 2Mbps Rural Broadband Enabling Technology
UK Government Q and A on the New Broadband Investment Fund »
Comments are closed.
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Once the Lisbon treaty article 50 is posted, whenever that might be, I suspect the UK will apply for (and possibly be granted) derogation from EU requirements before 2019 if the rules do not suit the UK regulators/legislators.
You do have to wonder why the European Commission feel it appropriate to define USOs for what could surely be better left to local democratic governments to decide based on local needs and requirements. By all means set the EU frameworks on what can be done within competition law and state aid rules to allow for local definitions of a USO, but this just looks like scope-creep. Leave it up to local democratic institutions, not by dictat from the centre.
This is one of the many reasons why 17.4 million people voted to leave the dictatorship that is the EU , Problem is that we have a Pro Eu PM that thinks sharia law is a good thing for britain
Far from a dictatorship, for many the closest they got to a representative vote, see the 2015 general election and how unrepresentative it was, but hey.
@Ignition
There are no direct elections to the European Commission. Commissioners are appointed by opaque political deals between countries. The EU parliament does, of course, have direct elections, but this is an EU commission initiative and reflects their tendency to centralisation of decision making in an area which could easily be left to local democratic decision making as long as it conforms to competition and state aid rules.
The Commission may present it as an initiative but zero legal force without Council and Parliament.
Much of the EU telcoms regulation is based on Ofcom/the UK – it will be interesting to see what the EU does after Brexit..