Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Nexfibre Fined £41k for Safety Failings During UK Full Fibre Rollout UPDATE

Friday, May 24th, 2024 (10:16 am) - Score 2,760
virgin media o2 engineer at work over trench 2021

Broadband network builder nexfibre, which shares some of the same parentage as retail UK ISP partner Virgin Media (VMO2), has been hit with fines and charges totalling £11.3k in Somerset and £30k in Devon (England) after the local courts found them guilty of various roadworks offences that “posed a danger to pedestrians“.

Just for context. Telefónica, Liberty Global and InfraVia Capital Partners originally setup the new £4.5bn nexfibre joint venture in 2022 (here), which aims to deploy an open access full fibre network to reach “up to” 7 million UK homes (starting with 5m by 2026) in areas NOT currently served by Virgin Media’s network of 16m+ premises. The funding reflects £3.3bn of fully underwritten financing and up to £1.4bn in equity commitments.

NOTE: Virgin Media is the only ISP on nexfibre’s network via an “exclusive partnership” (here), but they plan to add more ISPs via wholesale in the near future (here). Virgin Media’s own network will shortly also open up to wholesale via NetCo (here).

The operator has so far covered 1 million premises with their Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) lines and are also in the process of investing another £1bn during 2024 to cover another million. But unfortunately, some of their street works (civil engineering), which harnesses Virgin Media’s build engine, has fallen foul of good safety standards.

Firstly, Somerset Council, via the Taunton Magistrates Court, prosecuted the firm (here) following works carried out in Bridgwater. Nexfibre admitted “failing to install proper traffic management to ensure the safety of pedestrians” while working in two of the town’s streets in breach of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991.

The Two Somerset Offences

• On Tuesday 12 September 2023, Nexfibre Ltd carried out street works at Taunton Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, in contravention of S65 of NRSWA 1991 by failing to install traffic management to ensure the safety of pedestrians, particularly those with disabilities and the travelling public affected by the works.

• On Thursday 21 September 2023, Nexfibre Ltd carried out street works at Westonzoyland Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, again in contravention of S65 of NRSWA 1991 by failing to install traffic management to ensure the safety of pedestrians, particularly those with disabilities and the travelling public affected by the works.

Along with the two charges in Somerset, Nexfibre also pleaded guilty to “nine similar charges” in Devon and had to pay a total of £30k in fines and charges.

Richard Wilkins, Somerset Council’s Lead Member for Digital, said:

“We take these sorts of offences very seriously, carrying out works without proper measures is simply unacceptable. We will take action if companies are in breach of their duties. Our message to the public is please report issues to Somerset Council if you see them – help us to make sure companies work in a safe and considerate manner.

The court imposed fines totalling £8,000, costs of £3,325 for the offences in Somerset.”

The Taunton Magistrates Court did, however, give Nexfibre credit for entering guilty pleas “at the earliest opportunity” and accepting the mitigation measures. But they also found “aggravating factors in that the works were deficient in any pedestrian safety and therefore there was a danger to pedestrians and road users alike and that the offences were numerous and committed over two counties“. We have asked Nexfibre to comment.

UPDATE 28th May 2024

The response took a bit longer than usual due to the Bank Holiday, but it just dropped into our inbox.

A Spokesperson for nexfibre told ISPreview:

“We take these incidents very seriously and are disappointed that our third-party contractor fell short of the high standards both we and the council rightly expect. Safety is always our top priority when working to bring our full fibre network to more homes and businesses and we are working with the contractor to ensure this does not happen again.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
9 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Digital Dave says:

    Why doesn’t this surprise me. You should see how their Tier 1 contractor operates in Essex. No permits, no TM and using just a few cones (no barriers or signs) and a van as a rolling version of traffic management on roads in excess of 40mph, whilst accessing BTOR chambers.

    It’s refreshing to see local authorities taking action against them, as BTOR are failing to pursue them with Candid’s (for poor quality) or escalations for failing to follow the PIA description as all the other smaller operators do.

    1. Avatar photo Andy says:

      The fine is to persuade firms to comply with H&S measures, to ensure the H&S of everyone, not just the installers, but passers by. How much is your live worth?
      On a second point have they actually bothered burying that ducting in the picture, or just swept the rubbish to one side. Doesn’t look anywhere near 250mm.

  2. Avatar photo Anthony says:

    Is it just me, but I just cannot see how this helps anyone. These ISPs are providing a much needed and very expensive service by installing these Fibre cables in every street. Issuing them hefty fines like this just seems petty and will discourage future builds. Yes its an inconvenience when they are in your street but they are done within a few days. Gas pipe installers on the other hand are there for months and cause so much havoc.

    1. Avatar photo Jason says:

      Safety on the highways etc is very important . Safety often gets breached in favour of roll out speed.

    2. Avatar photo NE555 says:

      > Issuing them hefty fines like this just seems petty and will discourage future builds

      Or it might just save someone’s life – including their contractors. That’s the whole point of the fines.

    3. Avatar photo Vince says:

      “hefty”

      Hah, £40K is isn’t hefty.

      But also, you sound like you’re suggesting ‘broadband speed’ is more important than safety and people’s lives… not sure that’s a sensible view to have.

  3. Avatar photo matt says:

    Should add a few 000’s to those numbers otherwise it’s just “cost of doing business”

  4. Avatar photo Bob Adger says:

    Avonline builds

  5. Avatar photo JJ says:

    Nex-fine-bre

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching or random moderation checks by the anti-spam system.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £25.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £26.50 - 27.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Sky Broadband UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
New Forum Topics
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £19.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £21.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5635)
  2. BT (3544)
  3. Politics (2572)
  4. Openreach (2322)
  5. Business (2299)
  6. Building Digital UK (2262)
  7. FTTC (2052)
  8. Mobile Broadband (2007)
  9. Statistics (1809)
  10. 4G (1696)
  11. Virgin Media (1651)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1482)
  13. Fibre Optic (1413)
  14. Wireless Internet (1408)
  15. FTTH (1382)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon