» ISP News » 

New UK Map of Broadband ISP Speed Finds 13 Percent Get Below 2Mbps

Tuesday, August 14th, 2012 (8:22 am) - Score 5,410

Telecoms analyst Point Topic has today published a new UK map of broadband speed availability, which claims that 13% of UK homes and businesses (nearly 4 million premises) still can’t receive internet download speeds of above 2Mbps (Megabits per second) and most are in rural areas.

Point Topic’s map helps to highlight the scale of the problem faced by the government’s Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) office, which aims to make superfast broadband (25Mbps+) services available to 90% of people in each local authority area by 2015. The secondary Universal Service Commitment (USC) goal also seeks to bring download speeds of “at least” 2Mbps to everybody in the UK (i.e. the last 10%) within the same timescale.

The map itself (below) shows red areas with lower speeds (0Mbps to 2Mbps) and green areas with higher speeds (up to 100Mbps+). As you’d expect the geographic majority of rural areas, where only a relatively small proportion of people live, are dominated by the slowest speeds due to being the least economically viable to serve and upgrade. By contrast the towns and cities are almost always the first places to get new telecoms services due to high density populations and greater general prosperity.

2mbps broadband speed uk map 2012

Despite the bleak picture for rural areas it should still be said that many urban areas also suffer from similar speeds and poor availability woes. Point Topic highlights this by noting that residents in the Isle of Dogs (East London) suffer from slow speeds too, although both BT and Hyperoptic are competing to close the gap in that particular example (here). Earlier this year ISPreview.co.uk ran a much more detailed article on this very subject that explains the problems in more detail – Lack of Fast Broadband is NOT Just a Problem for UK Rural Areas.

Point Topic has also completed a comparative study looking at the number of broadband lines it expects to see within an area – given the availability of broadband and demographics in the area – with the actual number of lines.

Oliver Johnson, CEO of Point Topic, said:

The results show a notable sway towards the South of England, where users have a much higher propensity to take-up broadband than the rest of the UK. A lot is made of the urban rural digital divide, but the impact of lower broadband take-up in the North would only be expected to add to the general divide in things like health conditions and earnings between the North and South of England.”

Meanwhile a growing number of smaller ISPs and community initiatives, such as the Broadband 4 Rural North (B4RN) project in Lancashire, are working to close some of the most serious gaps in rural broadband performance and availability. But Point Topic notes that such efforts will not be enough to achieve the government’s broadband goals across the whole country.

Oliver Johnson added:

There are still going to be coverage gaps if you analyse the plans to date. There are currently 3.7 million premises – residential and business – outside the 2Mbps
fixed footprint and we are projecting more than two and a half million still outside the reach of superfast broadband in 2016. It’s the same old story, where commercial deployment isn’t a possibility there are problems getting the promised coverage to the consumer.”

The analyst cautions that “coverage doesn’t equal access” and points to the low take-up of superfast broadband connectivity. It was revealed last week that just 10% (2 million+) of the UK’s fixed line ISP subscribers were connected via a superfast broadband (25Mbps+) service at the start of July 2012 (here), which is despite Ofcom saying that related services are now available to 60% of premises.

One reason for this lack of adoption is that most superfast services attract a monthly price premium of between £5 to £15. “Not only does broadband have to be available, it has to be affordable,” said the analyst’s report. Easier said than done, especially given the often huge costs of deploying new services. Many urban areas also already have good connectivity, which makes superfast less attractive.

As a side note it’s important to stress that Point Topic’s map does not appear to be based upon real-world performance, which is often below the headline rates or predicted line estimates given by most UK internet providers. The red areas should thus be even more dominant, albeit only for fixed line broadband ISPs (Satellite?).

Leave a Comment
16 Responses
  1. “Point Topic’s map does not appear to be based upon real-world performance”

    They also seem to have forgotten about or decided to ignore satellites!

  2. Avatar Chris Conder says:

    Homes passed by ‘superfast’ already have fairly good connections, that is why people don’t take up the service.

    Funding should not be given to make a few more a bit faster, the funding should go to the areas who have limited or no connectivity. The only way to get connectivity to those areas in a futureproof way is with fibre. Once those areas are fibred up the market will deliver the rest. There is no point in using ‘alternative technology’ to bridge the divide. It will all be to do again in a few years as it can’t deliver the future.

    Support the altnets. Light the fibre.

    1. Avatar FibreFred says:

      And how do we support the altnets?

    2. Avatar Gadget says:

      Just to clarify then it’s “support the altnets, but only if they offer fibre not wireless or DSL”?

  3. Avatar bobEvans says:

    The focus of the BT rolout has always been very flawed. THey have foccussed on rollout to areas that already have fast broadband speeds hense the low & slow take up speeds whilst at the same time ignoring the outer areas of towns & cities that have poor speeds but have very high demand

    1. Avatar FibreFred says:

      A myth

      I currently get 3Mbps is that fast? FTTC will be enabled in my area in the next month or two, I live on the outer area of a city

    2. Avatar DTMark says:

      Try getting a 3G modem and get rid of that knackered old landline 😉

    3. Avatar FibreFred says:

      I’ll take a chance with the crappy copper FTTC 😉

  4. Avatar FibreFred says:

    What a pointless map, what exactly are we looking at here? So the red areas are areas where 1, 10, or 100 people can only get 2Mbps? What it is actually based on?

  5. Avatar Phil says:

    Point Topic is a joke – cannot view proper map to zoom in unless a license fee to pay subscription first. Unbelieved greed!

  6. Avatar SlowSomerset says:

    Long way to go then BT Fanboys.

  7. Avatar Kyle says:

    Again, this is just a garbage representation of the rubbish they spouted last week regarding the level of ‘hybrid superfast’ technology.

    This is just a visual representation of the same nonsense, showing only theoretical (maximum) speeds and represents nothing in terms of real-world statistics.

    What are we going to get next week? A picture of each town showing where these elusive maximum speeds are achieved?

  8. Avatar DTMark says:

    Last I heard, 14% of people couldn’t get 2Mbps. Now it appears to be 13%, so it’s an improvement if only a slight one.

    Notwithstanding that this is “what people get” as opposed to “what people can get” which would be more valuable, I’d like to see that redrawn for modern basic broadband speeds e.g. 6Mbps+. I suspect it would look utterly woeful.

    1. Avatar FibreFred says:

      Yep and that’s the problem with these reports. How many of those red areas can actually get Virgin cable (should they wish) how many could get FTTC but are happy with their cheapo service from TalkTalk or whoever

  9. Avatar tony says:

    BT could easily publish the amount of lines syncing below 2Mbit and i’m sure it would be way above 13%

    1. Avatar Somerset says:

      Based on what? Obviously depends on the distribution of lines from exchanges.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Onestream £19.99 (*27.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £21.00 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW TV £22.00 (*40.00)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2910)
  2. BT (2826)
  3. FTTC (1812)
  4. Building Digital UK (1776)
  5. Politics (1714)
  6. Openreach (1667)
  7. Business (1491)
  8. FTTH (1345)
  9. Mobile Broadband (1281)
  10. Statistics (1276)
  11. 4G (1105)
  12. Fibre Optic (1087)
  13. Wireless Internet (1050)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1044)
  15. Virgin Media (1035)
  16. EE (729)
  17. Vodafone (708)
  18. TalkTalk (690)
  19. Sky Broadband (686)
  20. 5G (570)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact